Claims of Exclusion Stir Tensions Within ODM
Fresh disagreements have emerged within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) over allegations that some party members have been sidelined in discussions surrounding the proposed Sh2 billion compensation fund for victims of police brutality and politically related violence.
Fresh disagreements have emerged within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) over allegations that some party members have been sidelined in discussions surrounding the proposed Sh2 billion compensation fund for victims of police brutality and politically related violence.
The internal unease has exposed growing divisions within the party at a time when ODM continues to strengthen its working relationship with President William Ruto’s administration.
Senior party figures have reportedly raised concerns over the manner in which decisions concerning the compensation programme are being handled, with some leaders claiming they have been left out of key consultations despite their long-standing involvement in the victims’ advocacy agenda.
The compensation fund, which has been included in government budget plans, is intended to support individuals and families affected by police excesses, political unrest and other forms of state-related human rights violations over the years. The initiative has been one of ODM’s longstanding demands and has featured prominently in negotiations between the party and the Kenya Kwanza administration.
However, the implementation process has now triggered dissatisfaction among sections of the party leadership. Some members argue that decisions are increasingly being made by a small group of individuals, leaving out leaders who have historically championed the victims’ cause.
The matter gained public attention after concerns were raised over inadequate consultation and communication within the party structures. Critics say such an approach risks creating unnecessary friction and undermining unity at a time when ODM is navigating a sensitive political partnership with the ruling coalition.
Political analysts say the disagreement reflects broader challenges ODM faces as it balances cooperation with the government while maintaining its identity as an independent political force. They warn that unresolved internal disputes could fuel perceptions of favouritism and alienate sections of the party base.
The Sh2 billion compensation package has attracted significant public interest, with victims and human rights groups calling for transparency in identifying beneficiaries and distributing the funds. There have also been calls for independent oversight to ensure only genuine victims receive compensation.
Civil society organisations have urged the government and political actors to keep the process free from partisan influence, arguing that compensation should be guided solely by justice and documented evidence rather than political affiliation.
Despite the emerging tensions, ODM leaders have reiterated their commitment to ensuring victims receive justice and compensation. Party officials maintain that the programme represents an important step toward addressing historical injustices and rebuilding public trust in state institutions.




